Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 1221 - 1240 of 5,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The amended petition in these companion matters alleges inter alia respondent's tendency toward sadistic sexual practice as well as bestiality. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
At defendant Hall’s guilty plea hearing, which is a matter of public record, government counsel stated that: Mr. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 4:29 am by Broc Romanek
Now the NYSE’s proposal has been refiled as SR-NYSE-2017-30 (the withdrawn proposal and amendments 1, 2 and 3 were all related to SR-NYSE-2017-12). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
  Section 32-2901, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read: START_STATUTE32-2901. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Here are ten representative examples of Alito's awful behavior.1) In 1985, Alito applied for a job in the Ronald Reagan Justice Department. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
 G 1/03 (which relates to disclaimers of undisclosed subject matter and sets strict rules for their use) is said not to be much help to the question of disclaimers relating to disclosed subject matter (point 3.9 of G 2/10). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
  In sum, no matter how bad a job the Grouper does, it can hardly do worse than the current procedure. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 7:20 am by admin
., cartel) case under Canada’s amended Competition Act, partially brought under the amended section 45 of the Competition Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:57 am by Lyle Denniston
On April 1, when the Court issued its most comprehensive review so far of the burden put on the inmate and the defense lawyer to satisfy the Eighth Amendment (Bucklew v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 7:51 am
A decent summary would probably take up 10-15 law review pages and, after all, this is a blog! [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:36 pm
City of Seattle, No. 05-35752 In an action brought by a street performer challenging the constitutionality of certain rules governing a zone covering about 80 acres of land in downtown Seattle, summary judgment for plaintiff finding the rules facially violated the First Amendment is reversed as: 1) the rules satisfy the requirements for valid restrictions on expression under the First Amendment; 2) the rules are content neutral and… [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Sean Cuff
The SEC claimed Defendant violated sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and sections 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]