Search for: "Irish v. Irish"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 12:30 am
Related PostsJanuary 10, 2011 -- Irish Women Politicians and Abortion: Hope for change after the ECHR ruling (0)December 15, 2010 -- In advance of A, B & C v Ireland: A Primer on the ECtHR (0) [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:32 am
Closer to home, here’s hoping that what has been happening in the UK helps to expedite proactive efforts to implement mooted clinical initiatives in Irish law schools. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:59 pm
"As James Grimmelmann notes in the first comment here, "you would think the Joyce estate had learned nothing from Shloss v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
They could have pointed out that there is an increasingly significant body of reported Irish IP law these days. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
On Friday last, March 25th 2011, in ED v DPP the High Court ruled that section 12 of the Immigration Act 2004 was unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 am
Citing Sisojeva v Latvia (Eur. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:53 am
In a landmark case last year of ZO (Somalia) v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
Google v Louis Vuitton C-236/08 which considered the degree of ‘neutrality’ on the part of an intermediary. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am
Its most important new claim was that the then “News of the World” Irish editor, Alex Marunchak, had been involved in email hacking. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
But this is not straightforward as a matter of Irish law. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
(Apparently Godfrey v Demon is the leading case. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
The claimant argued that, as entitlement to SPC was extended to Irish nationals, it was discriminatory not to extend it to nationals of other Member States. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
The relevance of the treatment of Irish nationals The Appellant argued that, as entitlement to SPC was extended to Irish nationals, it was discriminatory not to extend it to nationals of other Member States. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
The decision in Sinnott illustrates that in Irish law, no less that in England (Theakston v MGN [2002] EWHC 137 (QB) (14 February 2002); Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004)) and under the European Convention on Human Rights (Peck v UK 44647/98, (2003) 36 EHRR 719, [2003] ECHR 44 (28 January 2003); von Hannover v Germany 59320/00, (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [2004] ECHR 294 (24 June 2004)), it is no longer an answer (if it ever was) simply to… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
He made plenty of incriminating statements to Irish authorities that I am not going to republish here. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 am
Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
(See, Fajujonu v Minister for Justice [1990] 2 IR 151). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:58 am
The impact of this judgment to Irish law is enormous. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Ciaran TONER v the United Kingdom – 8195/08 [2011] ECHR 375 (15 February 2011): Northern Irish prisoner fails in Euro human rights challenge against refusal to allow him to vote as he missed voting registration deadline and was therefore too late in bringing claim. [read post]
