Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 7,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 12:23 am
Practice point: Pursuant to CPLR 3126, a court may strike an answer as a sanction if a defendant refuses to obey an order for disclosure or wilfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed.Student note: However, the drastic remedy of striking an answer is inappropriate absent a clear showing that the defendant's failure to comply with discovery demands was willful or contumacious.Case: Hoi Wah Lai v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:12 pm
Second, her property rights ruling in Didden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
See INS v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:58 pm
But even before Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
McGrogan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:42 am
Thus, Roesner failed to lay a proper foundation for the admission of records concerning the appellant’s payment history (see Citibank, N.A. v Cabrera, 130 AD3d at 861; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v RADS Group, Inc. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
M/V Delta Mariner. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
The post Case Review – Chandos Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
In Brannan v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:51 pm
The following contribution to our Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 6:55 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:04 pm
In Alvarez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
In adopting the ministerial exception, the Court distinguished its prior holding in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:14 am
Ry. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:23 am
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 8:12 am
Guzman v. [read post]
