Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 39,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
In recent years, it has become apparent that, despite the shared obligation for all Member States to adhere to the same fundamental rights standards, their practices are sometimes not in line with these standards (see for example the Dutch life long prison sentence which was not in line with Article 3 ECHR until recently (Murray v. the Netherlands, app. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm
” Shoff v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:42 am
In L.C.C. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Yet there was little public reaction in 1858 to Lincoln’s charge of a conspiracy among all three branches of government. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Based on my personal interactions, most lawyers seem to think little of the nondelegation claim in SEC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:26 pm
Moyer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:51 pm
Calabrese conceded that this intrusion may have been minor, but cited Boyd v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:50 am
Here is the abstract: In a series of recent decisions culminating in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:56 am
From McQueen v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
Blogpost 47/2023 ‘An “emulsified high fat offal tube” on account of it not containing enough meat’ were the words of the Rt. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am
The decision in Porter v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:28 am
This was exemplified with Zummo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:17 am
” People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
The short-on-substance concurrence is bizarre and, as unfortunately typical for TAFS judges, bears little resemblance to the rule of law where judges only opine on the facts being litigated before the court. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Frank HülsbergBurkhard FassbachIn the following guest post, Burkhard Fassbach and Frank Hülsberg take a look at alternative litigation risk insurance products. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 10:04 am
In L.C.C. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
As always with Bill, it’s the little bits of thought and commentary among the summaries that make it all a rewarding read: Shenzhen Long King Logistics Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
