Search for: "Long v State"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 45,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2022, 4:23 am
” Citizenship and the Census: State of New York v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
The potential list of "purposes" could be long. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
There’s a lot going on in Wendell v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
Moreover, I did that long before King v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:12 am
Our criminal defense attorneys in Fort Lauderdale know that this sets an important legal precedent that we hope other jurisdictions will follow, particularly for as long as we continue to have a patchwork of marijuana legislation from state-to-state. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm
Mims v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 8:19 am
United States, 135 S. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
A substantial evidentiary record documents that the federal government has long promoted fossil fuel use despite knowing that it can cause catastrophic climate change, and that failure to change existing policy may hasten an environmental apocalypse. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 2:53 pm
United States: (1) Whether convicted sex offenders are “required to register” under the federal Sex Offender Notification and Registration Act while in custody, regardless of how long they... [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 12:17 pm
United States, No. 06-9977. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Moreau v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:55 am
It almost feels voyeuristic to read the complaint in United States of America v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:49 pm
McCollum, the United States Supreme Court, citing “a long tradition... [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 2:22 am
The Second Circuit has recently issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:05 am
Bush v. [read post]
24 Dec 2024, 8:00 am
Manious v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:39 am
The commentary on United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
North Carolina, the burned-out brake light case in which the state supreme court ruled that an investigative stop may be based on an officer’s mistake of law, so long as the mistake is reasonable. [read post]
