Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Although mass incarceration in the United States is an important issue that most reasonable people believe policymakers must address, prison and jails haven’t historically gotten a lot of attention from digital rights advocates. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am
United States). [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
” As Chief Justice Marshall argued in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office) United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
United States Travis Price, a South Carolina man whose charges were dropped after police body camera footage showed he did not fight an officer who attacked him is suing the city of Rock Hill and U.S Rep. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:30 pm
This bill is aimed at religiously affiliated institutions, noting (in language that would not be codified) the Legislature’s agreement with Justice Alito in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release… [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
E, Moritz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
The Obama Administration interpretation of the AUMF The Department of Justice’s March 13, 2009 habeas brief argued that “[t]he detention authority conferred by the AUMF is necessarily informed by principles of the laws of war,” citing the governing opinion in Hamdi. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:30 am
Tamiz v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
United States (1971) and in Branzburg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
United States (1971) and in Branzburg v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
They were both written by the Chief Justice of the court. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:04 am
The main problem with Guantánamo, we suggested, was not that the United States was detaining people as “enemy combatants” but that it was not detaining the “right people. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am
United States comes up for one hour of argument. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
