Search for: "Miller v. State of California"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
And they also understand that the state’s ostensible goal—anti-pollution—could be more precisely accomplished by a law that is more directly tailored to the state’s purpose, a ban on littering (as the Court reasoned in Schneider v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
Save the El Dorado Canal v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
* Miller Industries Towing Equi [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Ct.), a petition for a "harassment restraining order" in California court. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Indeed, China is about as far away from New York as France is from California. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Indeed, China is about as far away from New York as France is from California. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Sioteco case where a California appellate court reversed earlier Fresno County trial court decisions and declared that public policy now supports state court approved factoring transactions. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Miller, Patrick J. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
" "Harmful to minors" is similar to the community-standards obscenity test that the Court formulated in Miller v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Danney, Comment, Sacking CEQA: how NFL stadium developers may have tackled the California Environmental Quality Act, 19 PENN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 131 (2011)Carolyn Davis, Note, Leave it on the field: too expansive approach to evaluating Title IX compliance in Biediger v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Aguila-Montes de Oca, the court said the California burglary statute, which was too broad to constitute generic burglary within the federal definition, could be treated as a “crime of violence” under § 1326 by examining statements made during court proceedings to narrow the statute to the generic definition of burglary; that is, although the statute did not require unlawful entry, the sentencing court could examine other material to discover whether the defendant broke… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
The court, though, avoided all that in its decision today (in an opinion by Judges Eric Miller, Bridget Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke), in concluding that the parents' lawsuit was filed too late under California law, and that the siblings' lawsuit failed because siblings weren't entitled to sue for wrongful death in such a situation. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
(Citing Concerned Dublin Citizens v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
Bob Miller has written a guest blog post for Peep Beep about the GDPR and ICO. [read post]
