Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 1221 - 1240 of 37,634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2013, 8:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  Commentary: This case is factually rich, specific to this particular specific plan, and from that perspective, is not likely to be replicated elsewhere. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
It is specific rather than catchall because it bans only the repetition of a specific allegation or set of allegations (here, of cheating). [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Trinity Management Services, Inc. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 116, 126-127 (Kraus).) [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 7:47 am by John Jascob
In their letters to the Commission, the six companies—Reynolds American Inc., Praxair, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., ITT Corp., Minerals Technologies Inc. and Barnes Group Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Xiaohong Liu In a decision by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals last week, In re Smith International, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) decision affirming the Examiner’s rejections of some claims in an ex parte reexamination. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm by Eric Caligiuri
Specifically, during the pendency of the litigation, nonparty Bio-Rad Laboratories had acquired 100 percent of Defendant Celsee, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm by Eric Caligiuri
Specifically, during the pendency of the litigation, nonparty Bio-Rad Laboratories had acquired 100 percent of Defendant Celsee, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9)  the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm by Gene Pierson
In this case, Vistan is the owner of US Patent No 5,870,949 is directed towards appliances, and more specifically towards a pitting apparatus with a box cam. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 6:27 am
A residential home builder is exempt from the Michigan Consumer Protection Act under MCL 445.904(1)(a) because the general transaction of residential home building, including contracting to perform such a transaction, is "specifically authorized" by the Michigan Occupational Code, MCL 339.101 et seq. [read post]