Search for: "Owens v. Owens"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2010, 3:10 am
Container, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:51 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
January 10th: SEC’s New Whistleblower Bounty Program - Richard Owens of Latham & Watkins and Linda Chatman Thomsen of Davis Polk & Wardwell will discuss the new regulation and how it may likely affect capital market participants, including the likely final provisions of the regulation, who will and who will not qualify for “whistleblower” status, what constitutes “original information,” the size of the “bounties” and much more. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Lib Dem fury over Royal gag on freedom of information laws, Glen Owen, Daily Mail – 15 Dec 2010. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:07 am
Libbey-Owens Ford Co., 758 F.2d 613, 624 (Fed. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
(For a good model of how courts should approach judicial review under these circumstances, see Fishermen’s Dock Cooperative v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 3:43 am
An attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legalresearch (see, Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006; McCoy v Tepper, 26 1 AD2d 592; Gardner v Jacon,148 AD2d 794, 796; Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645,646). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 6:12 am
V. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:12 am
Corp. v Dual Mfg. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:26 am
However, in KSR v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/826196.co1.pdf State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:06 am
Owens-Ill., Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 968.) [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
Owens, 820 S.W.2d 748, 751 (Tenn. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/08/08-10167.pdf United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Owens-Ill., Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 968.) [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
"To succeed on their motion for summary judgment, the defendants were required to demonstrate that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of a legal malpractice cause of action (see Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007; Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:29 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in AT&T Mobility Services v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
In Rutherford v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), Mr Justice Owen applied Rome II’s provisions to reach the conclusion that the compensation to be paid by the MIB (acting as the UK’s compensation body under the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) to the claimant as a result of an accident in a Spanish shopping centre car park in December 2007 in which the other driver was German (and uninsured) should be assessed in accordance with Spanish law, as the law of the… [read post]
