Search for: "People v Levels (Robert)" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Stuart said he would show us how Chief Justice Roberts maneuvered, and many are praising him, saying that this is what John Marshall did in Marbury v Madison. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 75 (1954), to which we owe the motion court no special deference. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
These transactions repeated themselves at increasingly higher levels of aggregators who purchased the drugs from multiple, lower level aggregators. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by admin
DON’T send those people to Barstow!!! [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:07 pm by David Bernstein
Recently, many commentators have defended Chief Justice Roberts from speculation that he capitulated to political pressure in NFIB v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm by Orin Kerr
Some laws are popular at a state level but unpopular at a national level. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
At one level, the evident conduct of the Chief Justice's fellow Republican appointees is very immature and suggests that the Supreme Court functions in a manner that better resembles the interactions of a dysfunctional family than those of the people who head the judicial branch of the United States government. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter
        The Chief Justice’s opinion Chief Justice Roberts adopts two of our characteristics that distinguish a tax from a penalty for constitutional purposes: its level and whether there is a scienter requirement. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:24 pm by Jon
In the meantime it could give rise to a new kind of tax used to coerce people, not just at the federal level, but at the state and local level as well.We can examine how federal gun control statutes began as tax statutes.Initially, a $200 tax was imposed on the purchase of certain kinds of disfavored firearms,  machine guns and saw-off shotguns.Then it was made a crime (presumably under the N&P Clause applied to the Tax Clause) to possess an item on which a tax… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 9:35 am by Alfred Brophy
By focusing on arguments about the backlash against Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
He's not just saying it would be a good idea to amend the law so there are penalties for copyfraud — many people say that. [read post]