Search for: "People v Thomas" Results 1221 - 1240 of 5,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:25 am
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 8:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Perhaps what bothers me most is the court’s (and the FCC’s) denigration of people who choose to receive tweets via text. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2006, for instance, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated as simple fact in eBay v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Harlan Stone's case file in Gobitis, rows upon rows of NAACP papers, Walt Whitman's walking stick, and Thomas Jefferson's hair!! [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
People like Joe Nocera of the New York Times take the suit as further evidence of incompetence at HP’s board. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Joined by Thomas and Gorsuch, he explained why free exercise should give religious people a lot more protection than it does today. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
The public gallery contains a lot of young people today, but is not completely full. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 pm
 So I would think that Justice Thomas's inquiry into the scope of minors' rights circa 1791 only makes sense, even on originalist premises, if the public meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment as of 1868 was that it incorporated the Bill of Rights as the Bill of Rights was originally understood, rather than, say, incorporating what people in 1868 thought the Bill of Rights meant, or what people in 1868 thought that people in 1791 thought the Bill of… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
 As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am by SHG
 While deeply passionate people are kvelling over the Supreme Court’s 7-1 opinion in Foster v. [read post]