Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
., People v Chiles, 70 AD3d 1453 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
Yeager v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
–Righthaven v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm
This may be a shock to people from other states. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm
If I see a CCIA brief that any significant part of its membership openly disagrees with (such as in Oracle v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
And there are real people in those jobs, people with families to feed. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
On 17 July 2014, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Building Register Ltd v Mark Weston ([2014] EWHC 2361 (QB)). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:59 am
Davis, supra, and Doe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:58 am
In a recent case, Davis et al., v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 8:05 am
Byers; and Ice and Water: Politics, Peoples, and the Arctic Council, by John English George H. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
On the same day Nicola Davies J concluded the hearing of the CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:52 pm
See People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Davis that people have an expectation of privacy in “even one point of cell site location data. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
[1] See United States v. [read post]
