Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by Elizabeth Murrill
” And, according to Morton v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by Nabiha Syed
Today the Court will hear oral argument in American Electric Power Co. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
The Judicial Branch's power of judicial review arises out of Marbury v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm by Business Law Post
Nevada does not restrict directors from issuing defenses in response to hostile takeover threats even if they “deny rights, privileges, power or authority to a holder of a specified number of shares or percentage of share ownership or voting power. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
In Geophysical Service Incorporated v Encana Corporation, 2016 ABQB 230 the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench had an opportunity to assess both claims to copyright in seismic data and the power of certain regulatory boards to release copies of such data to the public. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Today, I’ll talk about the details of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
    Policy position by United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders in relation to theprotection of human rights in sport without discrimination based on sexual orientation, genderidentity, and sex characteristics31 October 20231. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:34 am by Kurt R. Karst
  Further, FDA has not opined on whether REMS patents can be listed in the Orange Book (though the FTC did not mince words in saying that such listings were anticompetitive in the Jazz v. [read post]