Search for: "Roy v. AT" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by The Legal Blog
Justice Ashutosh Mookerjee speaking for the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court in Dwijendra Narain Roy vs. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 20-21 January 2011… [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade covers his portrayal across the media here. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
  In a thoughtful piece – “PCC Plus – a way to make self-regulation work in the public, and press, interest” – Roy Greenslade. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade is giving up his valuable and insightful daily media blog in the Guardian. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  Roy Greenslade has a blog post on the appointments. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm by Kelly
(TorrentFreak) Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names UDRP not suitable to obtain domain name originally registered with your consent – WIPO domain name decision in Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]