Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2007, 7:30 pm
The big case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States this past week, at least for patent attorneys like the host of last week's Blawg Review #106, was KSR v Teleflex. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff [also] points out that the third-party he accuses of sexual assault is a high-ranking person in well-known advocacy organizations that are active in Republican and conservative political circles, and defendant was "a key organizer of the January 6, 2021, 'Stop the Steal' rally that led to the attempted insurrection at the United States Capitol. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am by Cody Poplin
Hardline opponents of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani have responded with sharp criticism to his comments earlier this week; he had called hard-line politicians who oppose negotiations with the United States “cowards. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
United States dissent, Congress could delegate fact-finding to the Executive Branch, but not “policy judgments. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:28 am by SHG
Wally, ever the optimist, hopes that circuit court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
No question was raised as to petitioner's loyalty to the United States. . . . [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
  This approach is both profound and profoundly relevant to the actual state of contemporary regulatory governance in which states remain powerful but not the singular regulatory actors within the structures of global production. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
 Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat)   United States… [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Despite that, the tension surrounding foreign workers in the United Kingdom and their post-Brexit status has already begun to mount. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The DOL rule, “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States,” takes effect immediately on publication (October 8, 2020). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The DOL rule, “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States,” takes effect immediately on publication (October 8, 2020). [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am by Karina Lytvynska
In the United States, the debates on an artist’s fair use defense have been simmering catalyzed by the famous the case, Prince v. [read post]