Search for: "STATE v BURNS" Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am by Andrew Crocker and Nate Cardozo
And if disclosing vulnerabilities will truly burn “techniques” and expose “sensitive intelligence operations,” that seems like a good argument for formally weighing the equities on both sides on an individualized basis, as we advocate. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:45 am
Commonwealth v Hector Rengifo, N. 15-1779, August 5, 2016               This case answers the burning question, “When does a Pennsylvania time served to twelve month sentence equal of sentence of almost two and one-half years for the purposes of the U.S.S.G.? [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
There is bad law, terrible law, like Graham v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” As the Court of Appeals opined in Capital Newspapers v Burns, 67 N.Y.2d 562, “while an agency is permitted to restrict access to those records falling within the statutory exemptions, the language of the exemption provision contains permissive rather than mandatory language, and it is within the agency's discretion to disclose such records, with or without identifying details, if it so chooses. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
So if you take the United States – one can quibble about where one draws the line – but the First Amendment is the guiding principle that has guided the development of the cause of action. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:53 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources:Exploding e-cigarette batteries sending more burn victims to Seattle hospital, June 11, 2016, The Seattle Times, By JoNel Aleccia More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
To her credit, Champaign County State’s Attorney Julia Rietz announced today that Mellott won’t be charged: The State’s Attorney’s Office is declining to file charges against (Bryton) Mellott as the act of burning a flag is protected free speech according to the US Supreme Court decision, Texas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Recent decisions by Administrative Law Judges of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsHuman Resources Administration v Smart, OATH Index No. 1325/16NYC Dept. of Transportation v Harris, OATH Index No. 1531/16 Matter of Smart: In the Smart case, OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin F. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
Tags: best of, claims fraud, Florida, WO writings Fraud week V: lucrative gore is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by familoo
She expressly states he may have injured her, albeit innocently. [read post]