Search for: "STATE v. SMALL" Results 1221 - 1240 of 16,875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In this regard, the Interim Report recommends that the WFL prohibit workplace discrimination in respect of the following characteristics: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, (v) disability and mental health conditions (the “Protected Characteristics”). [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 3:05 am by jonathanturley
Some may need a small extension on a deadline while others may need to have something removed from their plate completely. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To take one example, at the time that the Court decided the leading qualified immunity case of Harlow v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Arizona – Pro-Lake PAC Didn’t Fabricate Its Source of $2.1 Million, Officials Concluded Last Year Arizona Mirror – Jim Small | Published: 2/27/2023 A campaign finance complaint accusing a super PAC that spent $2.1 million boosting Kari Lake’s bid for Arizona governor of inventing the source of its funding was quietly dismissed last year after elections officials determined a media report questioning the money’s origin was inaccurate. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 10:00 am by Josh H. Escovedo
With that said, it is likely that at least some of the issues in this context will be affected by the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:14 pm by Daniel Harawa
ShareIn many ways, Monday’s oral argument in Dubin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Ryan Merkley
” Oribson’s label sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, where the justices sided with the band and added one small but important bit of case law to U.S. copyright. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
Otherwise, a company risks not only being banned from using the slogan or trade mark or the statement deemed unlawful (with obvious impact on, for example, marketing and production plans), but also economic sanctions of no small importance. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm by Michael Lowe
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am by Frank Cranmer
On Tuesday morning during Oral Questions in the Commons, the Secretary of State for Justice said this in reply to a supplementary question from Martin Docherty-Hughes (West Dunbartonshire, SNP): “We have made it clear that we would not rule out ever withdrawing from the ECHR in the future”. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 2:48 pm by John Floyd
”   The CCA answered this question in the negative on February 15, 2023, in Edwards v. [read post]