Search for: "State v. General Development Corp." Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
California Table Grape Commission and US Dep’t of Agriculture (USDA) (Patently-O) CAFC: Offer for sale before invention occurs may bar patentability: August Technology Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 12:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
  The Court addressed this provision in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:37 am by Jeff Gittins
Margaret Dayton (R–Orem) is sponsoring Senate Bill 23, which was recommended by the State Water Development Commission. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm by Lorene Park
For example, in Shirley v Precision Castparts Corp, an employee had long been prescribed Vicodin to manage pain from work-related injuries. [read post]