Search for: "State v. Governor" Results 1221 - 1240 of 6,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2018, 12:38 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
On August 20, 2018, Governor Murphy issued Executive Order No. 34  grossly limiting the hunting of black bears in the State. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
  And, as a backstop, it's a call to the Governor and Legislature to pick up the baton as well -- just in case the courts feel constrained by precedent and/or the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
  (At least until it took two solid hours, and fifteen different attempts, to execute the last guy, at which point the Arizona governor put a moratorium on executions, until the state figures out how to actually "humanely" kill someone.) [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:05 pm
Becerra was appointed to that office by former Governor Brown in 2016. [read post]
Lord Reed noted that this was contrary to the principle under UK administrative law that a statutory power must be exercised by the person on whom the power has been conferred (R v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison ex parte Hague [1990] UKHL 8 and Leech v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [1988] UKHL 16 cited). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Marty Lederman
  Compare this level of state participation with, for example, the amicus brief filed by all forty-nine other states in Maryland v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
Most states, however, including California, impose criminal liability on a person aiding and abetting suicide. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Foley (Ohio State University College of Law) has posted The Founders’ Bush v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:43 am
The Michigan Supreme Court finally came down with their opinion in National Pride at Work v Governor of Michigan. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:34 pm by Jason Shinn
The case is Midwest Inst of Health, PLLC v Governor of Michigan (In re Certified Questions from the United States Dist Court), _ Mich __, __ NW2d __ (Oct. 2, 2020). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
”  Second, it preserves the integrity of the governor’s veto power by preventing “a practice under which the legislature could include in a single act matters important to the people and desired by the Governor and other matters opposed by the Governor or harmful to the welfare of the state, with the result that in order to obtain the constructive or desired matter the Governor had to accept the unwanted portion. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:19 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (11-955) and Scrushy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:10 pm
All of this would equally apply to a contingency at the State level, like the one which V Venkatesan points out. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:22 pm by Richard Pildes
  The most important court decision on that question was handed down by the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]