Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 7,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2021, 4:00 am
In Joseph v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:09 am
Tuesday’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
In 74 films you’ll see arguments in significant judgments, some actual (C-SPAN) and some, like United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:06 pm
Alioto v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
In my immediate response to last week's decision in Snyder, I argued that the decision had to be seen as of a piece with last term's decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:57 am
The decision says that it is putting this back to the citizens of each state, but are the rights of women in more liberal states at risk too? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
However, Moore v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am
One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
” However, in Amato v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
Grisolia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:59 am
, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:39 pm
Maril, From Liberation To (Re)Criminalization: Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
On July 21, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court in McNeil v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 9:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In Lyng v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:35 am
The opinion in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
