Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 1:42 am
It took the Court of Appeals (Livingston, Miner and Trager [D.J.]) a year-and-a-half to write this opinion, and it shows: the statement of facts alone is over 20 pages. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
In a transparent attempt to hamstring pharmaceutical marketing, the state of Vermont made it illegal for data miners to sell physician prescribing information to pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
See Business Roundtable v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
Sutcliffe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
V. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
See Kelo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
See Kelo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
HMB Interests, L.L.C. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Jonathan Djanogly, replied for the Government. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:51 pm
Flook and Bilski v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm
All the asbestos minerals are silicates, as are most of the minerals on planet Earth. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:05 am
This ruling re-examines the Second Circuit's seminal attorneys' fees decision, New York State Association for Retarded Children v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm
Commonwealth Ct. 664 (1972) Utter v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:37 am
Gulf Coast Minerals Mgmt. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
See IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Most importantly, it was this principle that drove the United States Supreme Court to famously observe in Wilko v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
