Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2025, 12:31 pm
And Cooper v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:38 am
However, recent Supreme Court, federal court, and agency decisions have ignored this longstanding analysis and have instead examined these issues through the lens of Taylor v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
The record [in the suit he later filed] contains affidavits from female students stating they informed Bell of this misconduct by Wildmon and Rainey. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:47 am
Prah v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
The court in Taylor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
In 1990, the California Supreme Court basically decided in Moore v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Taylor Reveley7. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
In McCollough v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:00 am
Taylor himself. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
State Senator Lena Taylor objected that the bill “breaks down the wall of independence around independent agencies. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:25 am
In doing so, it quoted a 2006 US Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:25 am
In doing so, it quoted a 2006 US Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
No. 1J v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am
Supreme Court’s holding nearly two hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
As he said in A v B, “The [public figure] should recognise that because of his public position he must expect and accept that his actions will be more closely scrutinised by the media. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the lower court’s ruling.* Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation resulting from conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia.** Pursuant to Civil Service Law Section 76.4, many Taylor Law collective bargaining agreements provide that a permanent employee in the classified service may challenge a disciplinary action in accordance with the terms set out in a "contract… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
After holding that “the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by the Taylor Law,” the Appellate Division explained: Contrary to the District's contention, an arbitrator's award in favor of the Association would not violate public policy. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:25 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Lavar Taylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]