Search for: "State v. Texas City"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
The nationwide injunction was issued by a single district court judge in Texas, at the behest of Texas and other states, and approved 2-1 by a divided panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
Wade, holding that the Constitution protects a woman’s right to an abortion, as an “abomination” and has supported Texas in a challenge to the state’s law criminalizing private consensual sex between two same-sex partners, he also recently voted to uphold a lower court’s ruling in favor of a transgender woman who contended that she had been fired from her job because of her transition from a man to a woman. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:33 am
The City of Fort Worth, Texas, 6-14-cv-00725 (Texas, E.D.) [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:15 pm
Bush, Joe Jamail, Pennzoil v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:37 pm
Finally we represents criminal defendants in the state and federal courts located in New York City. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:37 pm
Finally we represents criminal defendants in the state and federal courts located in New York City. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.) that because “the specialty plates bear sufficient indicia of private speech, … a reasonable and fully informed observer would recognize the message on the ‘Choose Life’ specialty plate as the message of a private party, not the state,” and “the messages communicated on specialty plates are private speech, not government speech. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Winfield v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Texas. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
We note that the Texas Supreme Court repealed previous forcible detainer provisions of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and implemented new rules for eviction suits at TEX.R.CIV.P. 510 et seq. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:06 pm
City of Dallas, 211 S.W.3d 808, 820 (Tex. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:06 pm
City of Dallas, 211 S.W.3d 808, 820 (Tex. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 9:45 am
The case is now pending on appeal in the El Paso Court of Appeals, Cause No. 08-16-00382-CV, Fort Stockton Holdings, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
Texas,” 1:30-3:15 PM: This panel focuses on the Supreme Court’s important decision on affirmative action in higher education in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 10:32 am
The Court’s opinion states that a taking for inverse condemnation purposes occurs when the government “intentionally took or damaged property for public use, or was substantially certain that would be the result” citing City of Keller v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
In dismissing the Visa petitions, the Supreme Court referred to a ruling in 2015, City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm
[T]he Texas Supreme Court has not adopted Model Rule 8.4(g), and it is not currently part of the Texas Rules. [read post]
