Search for: "Summers v. Summers"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 9,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
”The Appellate Division annulled Teacher's termination and the summer 2011 U-rating and then remanded the matter to DOE for completion of its final review of the second U-rating for the 2011-2012 school year [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 11:53 am
The Virginia General Assembly convened in a special session during the summer of 2009 to deal with Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
Dist., Layshock v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:49 am
See Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am
With the Supreme Court approaching the start of summer, the justices will likely decide the court’s major remaining cases by late June. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
LNSU #1, LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am
The Trade Union Congress was influential in getting them included in the Act, and my friend Lord Lloyd of Kilgerran took the leading role (I think) in piloting them through Parliament, but they hardly ever deliver for the employee-inventor (Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) being the single swallow that could not make a summer). [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:39 am
In Anderung v Anderung, 2013 WL 12142385 (S.D. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 2:23 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court of British Columbia held that a mining regulator may, in limited circumstances, owe a duty to pay a mine owner for its losses suffered as a result of a breach of a duty owed. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 am
Yesterday in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
Yesterday in Astrue v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:19 pm
This morning, in New Process Steel v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:28 pm
Yesterday, in Holland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 5:08 pm
One of the more controversial pieces I have written on this blog was in connection with the lawsuit brought by shareholders of Rohm & Haas to force Dow Chemical to complete its purchase of Rohm & Haas pursuant to a contract entered last summer that pegged the purchase price at $78 per share of Rohm & Haas. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:25 am
The court reiterated the standard that it had announced in Lundy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
The Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Smilowitz v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:50 pm
The case: Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:03 am
Costs of After-school Program and Summer Camp Qualify as Child Care Expenses. [read post]
