Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT" Results 1221 - 1240 of 5,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 11:07 am by Josh Blackman
Grants Pass may actually make it harder for local governments to manage homeless encampments. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:45 am by Steve Gottlieb
With Thomas and the Trump trio – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett – this is the crew that struck down Roe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by Marty Lederman
 The Zubik petitioners, for instance--including Catholic University and Priests for Life, which use insured plans--told the Court (pp. 45-46):Petitioners do not seek to “dictate the conduct of the government or of third parties,” [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is for this reason that the doctrine fell out of favor with the Rehnquist Court and was essentially abandoned in the mid-1990s (Justice Thomas penning its demise in Harper v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:14 pm by David Gans
  Far from establishing a constitutional ban on the sensitive use of race by the government—the view espoused by Thomas, Alito, and Chief Justice John Roberts—the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment rejected proposals to prohibit any and all use of racial classifications by the government and, in fact, enacted a long list of forward-looking race-conscious legislation intended to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]