Search for: "U.S. v. St. Val*" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 7:37 am by Rob Robinson
Legal Risks Under International Privacy Laws – bit.ly/JyhIRp (Sheldon, Mark & Anderson) Cyber-Threat Cooperation Emerging Between U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Hearing at St Louis, 16 days between Aug. 4, 2003 and Feb. 5, 2004. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
“The slickest way in the world to lie is to tell the right amount of truth at the right time-and then shut up. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[10]  In enacting the ICWA, Congress declared its policy to be the protection of the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families by the establishment of minimal Federal standards for the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children in foster or adoptive homes which will reflect the unique values of Indian culture, and by providing for assistance to Indian tribes in the operation… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
It is unclear why having fewer accredited investors, whether at 6.5% or 1.8% of U.S. households, is preferrable to having more accredited investors. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
V: Some Food for Thought The most effective method lies in using an economic incentive theory, like a tax, incorporated into an already existing infrastructure for enforcement. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The following passage from a U.S. judgment striking down a categorical ban on advertising by lawyers is instructive. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  So far as books by Justices are concerned, this new offering is more refined, extensive, and current than what had appeared previously in Fenton Martin and Robert Goehlert’s The U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
In practice, the second-earner penalty becomes evident when a non-working spouse considers the relative value of working an additional hour and the increased marginal tax rate or reduction in tax benefit their income would face. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]