Search for: "United States v. Generes"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 35,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
United States that “the President has the exclusive authority to remove executive branch officials. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Lujan v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Lujan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:14 am
SOLICITOR GENERAL INVITED TO FILE BRIEF: 08‑0465 THE STATE OF TEXAS v. $281,420.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13‑06‑00158‑CV, _ SW3d _, 04‑03‑08) The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the State. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 11:10 pm
Earlier this week, Senior United States District Judge Roger Vinson of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida declared the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Act”) void in a summary judgment decision in the case of State of Florida, by and through Attorney General Pam Bondi, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
United States [transcripts, PDF]. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
This is an unusual discussion, so I will quote it in full: Congress has provided that “[i]t is the policy of the United States … to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services, unfettered by Federal or State Regulation …. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:36 pm
The Bar contends that the appointment of attorneys to represent indigent litigants implicates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
In a highly-publicized case, United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:45 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court opens its new term with a number of international law and executive power v. power of Congress cases. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
Bristow v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
Mensing, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), a decision issued on June 23, 2011 by the United States Supreme Court ruled that generic drug makers cannot be sued under state law on the basis that they failed to provide adequate warning labels about potential side effects, effectively overturning U.S. appeals court rulings that allowed such lawsuits. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing a petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
Simcox v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:53 am
(Quoting PPL Wallingford Energy LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:23 am
In a convincing opinion, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has upheld the Board's decision [TTABlogged here] finding the term GRUYERE to be generic for cheese, and thus unregistrable as a certification mark. [read post]
