Search for: "4th Judicial District Court" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 11:42 am by Arthur F. Coon
  “The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Image from hereThe weekly review starts with a post by Gopika on the UK Supreme Court decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Limited v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
He also sued Time, Inc., for defamation in federal district court in Georgia. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:22 am by Robert Ambrogi
Bedsworth, associate justice of California’s 4th District Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Southern District of Texas 2013) (“In re Warrant”). [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  “The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:35 pm by Schachtman
Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F. 3d 257, 263–264 (4th Cir. 1999) (citing cases); Wells v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
It would seem grossly inefficient for the court in the second-filed case to proceed to hear the case on the merits until resolution of the first-filed case.(6 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, 4th ed., sec. 32:46 [footnotes omitted].)That quotation says it all. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:02 pm by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Montana 2013). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:38 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
In sum, district and appellate courts that have addressed this issue are deeply divided.Recognizing this split in judicial authority, and considering both the arguments advanced by the parties and the arguments offered by other courts, this Court concludes that the FRA doesnot preempt state and local anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:00 am
Accordingly, the case was remanded to the trial court for an "evidentiary hearing" at which the district court would figure out how much DHHS should get. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am by Steve Baird
In fact, Already took its penchant to continue the fight to invalidate Nike’s trade dress all the way to the Supreme Court, being told by both the District Court and the Court of Appeals along the way, that the counterclaim could not go forward since there was no longer a justiciable case or controversy. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See A Judicial Throwdown on CEQA's Baseline Requirements. [read post]