Search for: "AC v. State" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma looks at Turner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:21 am by NL
This presented some issues, as the standard of proof in the possession proceedings was the civil standard, but, following Clingham v Kensington and Chelsea RBC [2003] 1 AC 787, the standard of proof in the Crime and Disorder Act proceedings was the criminal standard. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:21 am by NL
This presented some issues, as the standard of proof in the possession proceedings was the civil standard, but, following Clingham v Kensington and Chelsea RBC [2003] 1 AC 787, the standard of proof in the Crime and Disorder Act proceedings was the criminal standard. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm by Rosalind English
Right to liberty: Entick v Carrington (1765) Prohibition on retrospective liability: Philips v Eyre (1870) 6 QB 1 (see our recent post on this principle) Prohibition of torture has long been a “constitutional principle”, according to Lord Bingham in A & Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 2 AC 221 The right to fair trail, defined in the Magna Carter as “due process of the law” (Chapter 29 of the 1354… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
(Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc v Shiu, December 12, 2014, Tatel, D; to be reported at 98 EPD ¶45,216) New requirements. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm by Joy Waltemath
The court also found that, in promulgating the rule, the OFCCP was justified in not exempting construction contractors (Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS Blog, Brandon Garrett weighs in on the court’s ruling last week in McWilliams v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Of course, we should usually follow a clear and constant line of decisions by the EurCtHR: R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator[2004] UKHL 26; [2004] 2 AC 323. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:54 pm by Larry
Recent Supreme Court cases, including United States v. [read post]