Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 4,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 3:34 pm
" United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 8:37 am
In New York this week, a judge ordered in Baker v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:24 pm
Baker, 242 A.D.2d 704, 663 N.Y.S.2d 49; Perez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:27 am
Baker, 2010 U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
Baker, 2016 U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
Baker, 2016 U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:35 pm
Virginia, from Baker v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:40 am
Here is a link to the audio from today’s United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:03 pm
Angie’s List Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:19 am
Precision Drone LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm
Pavan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Stock, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1862 (08 August 2008) Freeman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1863 (08 August 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sony Computer Entertainment UK Ltd v Cinram Logistics UK Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 955 (08 August 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Collett v Smith & Anor [2008] EWHC 1962 (QB) (11 August 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Bookmakers Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:20 am
Hallsmith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Baker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240-47 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting). [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:13 pm
Judge Baker wrote for the majority in Griggs, joined by Chief Judge Gierke and Judges Effron and Erdmann. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
