Search for: "D J
v.
C R"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 8:22 am
Eastern Armored Services, Inc., March 11, 2015, Fuentes, J.). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:56 am
If the case-law is to be believed, local authorities have a hard enough time introducing selective licensing schemes as it is (see R (Peat) v Hyndburn and R (Regas) v Enfield)). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:57 am
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO, Local 117, March 10, 2015, Owens, J.). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
The language of Article 66(c), UCMJ, its legislative history, and the decision of the Supreme Court in Jackson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
Psychol. 369 (2014); Abbie D. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
R. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:06 am
§ 63.022(1)(c),(d), Fla. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
SABRINA J. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
The post A new approach to improvements by J appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
Supreme Court Declines to Enshrine the Independence of the Bar as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
13 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
As Major J. put it in R. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
In this set of short wins, the one that I’d like to call attention to is United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
In this set of short wins, the one that I'd like to call attention to is United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
Le colloque a ainsi pour ambition d’analyser tout type d’action ou réaction juridique, quel que soit son auteur et quelle que soit son autorité, qui puisse être considérée comme un précédent lato sensu : comportement de chaque sujet du droit international apte à le lier en tant que tel ou à participer dans la formation d’une pratique générale,… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Peter J. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
The most-consulted French-language decision was R. c. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
School of Law) Christopher Jon Sprigman (NYU School of Law) Geoffrey R. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:28 pm
That portion of the order is not appealable as of right because it does not decide that branch of the cross motion and does not affect a substantial right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]), and leave to appeal has not been granted. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
El juez William J. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Two recent opinions, the one rendered by AG Wathelet on December 8, 2014, in Gazprom (Case C-536/13), and the other one given by AG Jääskinen, on December 11, 2014, in CDC (Case C-352/13) address the interplay between arbitration and EU law, especially in the context of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Katherine J. [read post]
