Search for: "Federal Employment Law Insider" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2016, 4:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   Critics of Justice Scalia’s majority opinion said that it threw out decades of employment discrimination law and raised huge barriers to future large-scaled discrimination cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by Zosha Millman
We’ll see… – Constangy’s Robin Shea writing out of Winston-Salem on her Employment & Labor Insider Return of the Beast: Religious Accommodation Redux – Baltimore attorney Fiona Ong of Shawe Rosenthal on their The Labor & Employment Report blog Facebook Hit with French Data Protection Authority Action – Including a Safe Harbor Count – Crowell Moring attorneys Robin B. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:29 am by Federal Employment Law Insider
More information on the proposed rule will be available in the February 2016 issue of Federal Employment Law Insider. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:38 am by Jon Hyman
 Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights Labor Relations National Labor Relations Board’s Unorthodox Treatment of McDonald’s Joint Employer Case — via Matt Austin Labor Law NLRB’s New Joint-Employer Standard To Be Put To The Test In Federal Court — via Labor Relations Can You Prohibit Employees from Taking Photos At Work? [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– California attorney Anthony Zaller of Van Vleck Turner & Zaller on their California Employment Law Report Will Largest Creditors Decide 50 Cent’s Financial Fate? [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court will not hear a challenge to a law that bans government contractors from donating money to federal candidates or political parties. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am by Robin Shea
We are non-partisan here at Employment & Labor Insider, but that doesn’t mean we can’t look forward to the Iowa Caucus. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 9:21 pm by Cody M. Poplin
CEJIL assures equal employment opportunities for all qualified persons without discrimination based on any reason. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Elina Saxena
Last night, the Fox Business Network hosted the sixth GOP primary debate of the 2016 campaign season in North Charleston, SC. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 6:12 am by Jim Sedor
Federal: For Hillary Clinton, Old News or New Troubles? [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Robin Shea’s Employment & Labor Insider NYT: Case Study Of Workplace Racial Discrimination In The Construction Trades — via FisherBroyles Court To Catholic School: No, You Can’t Fire People Because They Are Gay — via Workplace Fairness Social Media & Workplace Technology Controversial Cybersecurity Law Passed as Appropriations Rider — via Technologist Can Emojis Be Used… [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:31 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
The defendant claimed they were not responsible, citing federal safety regulations that state truck drivers are responsible for the safety and securement of loads. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 9:50 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Experience conducting challenging investigative research inside the United States is highly desirable. 6. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 1:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Louis lawyer Shannon Peters of Husch Blackwell on the firm’s blog, Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation Industry Insider For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Sexual Orientation Discrimination Versus Sex Discrimination Title VII is at the heart of federal anti-discrimination law. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For those unfamiliar with the dispute over this once-obscure law, the statutory language "exceeds authorized access" has divided federal courts for more than ten years. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
And if the Hatch provision becomes law, how would a federal court of appeals handle a future challenge to the Tax Court’s constitutional structure? [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
And if the Hatch provision becomes law, how would a federal court of appeals handle a future challenge to the Tax Court’s constitutional structure? [read post]