Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 15,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
This transition is shown in the figures below. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:18 pm
It's been a very slow week for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
The Supreme Court might have been particularly hesitant to hear yet another Apple v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
The IPKat is delighted to host a guest contribution by Simon Chapman (Lewis Silkin) on this very topic and on a case (Jack Wills v House of Fraser) in which he and his team have acted for the defendant.Here's what Simon writes:"Following Mr Justice Arnold’s finding (Jack Wills Limited v House of Fraser (Stores) Limited [2014] EWHC 110 (Ch)) that retailer House of Fraser was liable for trade mark infringement and passing off after adopting a… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 10:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 1:01 am
Vélez-Ibañez and Josiah Heyman, The U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:05 am
A recent article in The Wall Street Journal decried the increase of nursing home abuse lawsuits resulting in six-figure settlements or verdicts, prompting some in the industry to pack up and close shop. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 9:46 am
Legal academic salaries, while generally in the low six-figures, rarely go over, say, $400,000. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm
The Queen v Louis Riel / With an introduction by Desmond Morton. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:36 pm
For example, if you’re alleging only a violation of nursing home resident’s rights pursuant to F.S. ch. 400, as noted in the 2011 appellate court decision in Preston v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:19 am
Literally and figuratively, Kansas and Missouri stand at the crossroads of the United State’s quest for an “all-of-the-above” energy policy. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
If you're the sort of person who reads transcripts of Supreme Court oral arguments, and if you have even a passing interest in civil rights law, then you probably figured that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was history.The case was Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
These figures excluded vat, the CFA success fee and the court fee. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 12:55 pm
US v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
Gordon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Nobody really worries about this; I suspect that manufacturers figure that consumers figure that this stuff is bad for you, so the warning doesn't contain any meaningful news. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
In Newell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:06 am
As How Appealing notes here, the Second Circuit today issued this revised decision in its important variance case of United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:38 am
While brand harm may be what is motivating Southwest’s actions, that argument has not figured prominently in the proceedings. [read post]
