Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 1241 - 1260 of 13,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
Will sales figures be needed? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Last week, Mr Justice Floyd delivered his judgment in the case of ratiopharm & Sandoz v Napp Pharmaceuticals, but the IPKat has been taking a while to digest this very long and complicated judgment. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
   I figured I’d get around it by arguing that the prior panel hadn’t had the benefit of Michigan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:41 pm
Allan Gray to relocate HQ to V&A Waterfront JSE-listed Growthpoint says it has committed R684m for a new development on the landmark V&A Waterfront with investment management firm, Allan Gray, as an anchor tenant. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
One of the battles concerned a patent (see figures 1 to 3) granted to Apple for “Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image” (European Patent No. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by SHG
The name of the case is Paroline v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm by Christine Hurt
This past week, we covered Section 11 liability in Securities Regulation, and as law students have for decades now, we parsed through Escott v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
There was no logical basis for preferring significant figures approach [if you've ever wondered what is significant about significant figures, take a look at the quote in para 24: to the scientist there is a difference between 1.3 and 1.30 ...]. [read post]