Search for: "Leone v. Leone"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2022, 5:56 am
The United Nations has essentially done this before when it negotiated and established of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
In fact, de Leon was recently endorsed by the California Democratic Party in a rebuke to Feinstein. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:15 pm
I first encountered Loving v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
To succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence relied on by the defendant must "conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law" (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Millender and Ryburn v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:28 pm
” Leon Winston v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:54 am
• As discussed here, Judge Leon of the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
[Author’s note: North Carolina courts do not recognize the Leon good-faith exception for constitutional violations.] [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
Consider the ruling in a 1985 UK case, Lion Laboratories v Evans, [1984] 2 All ER 417, [1985] QB 526. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:26 am
In that case, they overruled New York v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel suggests that next term’s Salman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
The battle has shifted, however, to another front: the Leon / Herring / “Good Faith” pass for unlawful searches (a trend manifested most lately in Davis v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court to revisit Roe v. [read post]
