Search for: "Newman, Appeal of" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am by Stefanie Levine
The Federal Circuit first decided Classen’s appeal in 2008, when a panel comprised of Circuit Judges Newman and Moore and District Judge Farnan (sitting by designation) held in a one-paragraph, non-precedential decision authored by Judge Moore that Classen’s claims do not satisfy 35 USC § 101. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:00 am by Jeffrey Krivis
Newman firmly believed in the benefit of ‘creative chaos. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm by Rantanen
  On initial appeal, the CAFC affirmed, with Judge Moore penning an extremely short affirmance. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Newman's dissent in the case begins: On this appeal from a PTO rejection, the court has ap- plied a new ground of rejection—which the court calls “indefiniteness”—and issued a final judgment on that ground, although the applicant has had no opportunity to respond to the rejection. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Dennis Crouch
On appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, a split panel agreed that the claims lacked merit but found them impermissibly indefinite rather than anticipated. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
. '392 was found valid, both at district court, and on appeal, where the CAFC set its own formula for chemical obviousness - for this case at least. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:26 am by Steve Statsinger
August 12, 2011) (Newman, Calabresi, Hall, CJJ) Former defense attorney Robert Simels appealed his conviction, after a jury trial, of various counts relating to a witness-tampering scheme, and his fourteen-year sentence. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent and Trademark Office (“Patent Office”) and to errors in Table 3 of the ’392 patent, the same conduct upon which Apotex premised some of its inequitable conduct claims at issue in this appeal. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent and Trademark Office (“Patent Office”) and to errors in Table 3 of the ’392 patent, the same conduct upon which Apotex premised some of its inequitable conduct claims at issue in this appeal. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 4:39 am by Mike Aylward
 Newman appealed and on August 18, 2011, the Appeals Court of Massachusetts ruled that Newman’s counterclaim set forth a potential claim for both “property damage” triggering the insurer’s duty to defend. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
LangstonDocket: 10-1244Issue(s): Whether a court of appeals violates the sufficiency-of-the-evidence test laid out in Jackson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Exhaustion and License Christopher Newman, George Mason University School of Law, “What Exactly Are You Implying? [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
” The Court of Appeals (Newman, Calabresi and Katzmann) defers to the Secretary of Labor's interpretation of the FLSA. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Judge Newman in particular questioned the finality and certainty of such a practice. (12min-17min marks of oral argument). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by Dennis Crouch
Judges Newman, Lourie, Bryson, and Dyk are all eligible for Senior Status and Judge Linn will be eligible on his next birthday. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:26 am by Broc Romanek
The majority opinion -- issued nearly three years after the appeal was argued -- declined to resolve the beneficial ownership issue, noting that there was disagreement within the panel on the subject. [read post]