Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 21,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
The statute does not target the out-of-state vendor’s sales through agents who are not New York residents. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
The statute does not target the out-of-state vendor’s sales through agents who are not New York residents. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:09 pm
Possession and sale of marijuana remains a crime, albeit a federal (rather than state) one. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm
As Michael previewed this morning, the Supreme Court heard argument today in Helsinn v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In Robey v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:52 pm
Clark Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
In Sheehan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:31 pm
Showtime Entertainment, LLC v Town of Mendon, 2015 WL 4094282 (MA 7/8/2015)Filed under: Adult Entertainment Facilities, Current Caselaw [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
In Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:37 am
" State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm
Other states in similar cases have found that the physical presence requirement in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:52 am
Lujan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:51 am
In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:21 am
A quick update on the The Pom Wonderful LLp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:12 am
Forms & Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
The Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit of the state of Illinois has affirmed a judgment in Estate of Stanley Cora v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:08 am
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Co Ltd and others; Nokia Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs (Internationak Trademark Association intervening) (Joined Cases C-446/09 and C-495/09); [2011] WLR (D) 349 “Goods coming from a non-EU state which were imitations of goods protected in the European Union by a trade mark or copies of goods protected in the EU by copyright could not be classified as “counterfeit goods” within the… [read post]
