Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
On 21 November, in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2012] UKSC 55, the UK Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals' order for the disclosure of the identities of individuals who had used an online ticketing website to sell and purchase international rugby tickets at inflated prices in breach of the Rugby Football Union’s (RFU) ticket terms and conditions. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
Munning v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:35 am
Copyrights Meet Politics: Joe Walsh (Rockstar) v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 5:30 am
SEC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has issued its decision in the matter of Coty Germany v Parfümerie Akzente. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Sails v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
On the other hand, given the way Risk handled coverage of the "sovereign immunity issue" in Sistrunk v United States of America I am not at all surprised. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:53 am
In the case of Cooper v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
. must be stated with particularity’ ” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]). [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:36 pm
Kudos again to Matt who is one of the few factoring companies that stands up and is not afraid to state what is that they actually do. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
In Bilski, the Court considered claims covering a process for hedging risks of price changes by, for example, contracting to purchase commodities from sellers at a fixed price, reflecting the desire of sellers to hedge against a drop in prices, while selling commodities to consumers at a fixed price, reflecting the desire of consumers to hedge against a price increase. p. 5; Bilski v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
It reinstated that “genericide” does not occur “until the trademark has gone so far toward becoming the exclusive descriptor of the product that sellers of competing brands cannot compete effectively without using the name” TY Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:11 am
Discovery Builders, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2023 WL 4115074 (CA App. 6/22/2023). [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:01 am
Belk, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:08 pm
” Blough v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:00 am
Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
Under Abry Partners V, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:37 am
Sellers did state in the Coyle article that he thinks '"our clients remain resolute in their belief that statements by the secretary of Agriculture that he wants to settle [the] case are ones they can rely on. [read post]
