Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 12:42 pm
While this “single factor exigency” doctrine has never been approved in urine test cases, the trial court did so in the case of Swanson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
In the case of H v Eason Area School District (12 April 2011) a federal judge prevented a Pennsylvania school district from enforcing its ban on “I ? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Lederle Laboratories, 732 P.2d 297 (Idaho 1987), a vaccine case, the state’s highest court answered some certified questions from a federal court of appeals.As an aside, we have serious qualms about the psychology of certified questions. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court's decision in San Diego Building Trades Council v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:56 am
Wyoming v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:00 am
There, a former NFL player brought a personal injury action in state court against the NFL, seeking damages for a career-ending eye injury he sustained during a game when a referee threw a penalty flag that struck the player in the eye. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm
This point was made very clear in Gates v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
In ACLU of Minnesota v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Helle Sachse, Assistant District Attorney (Lauren Bernath Moore, Assistant District Attorney, with her) for the Commonwealth. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Hammernick, Case No. 10-cv-819, filed last year in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, an IT staffing firm sued its former employee for using LinkedIn to “connect” with, and allegedly solicit, its contract employees to work for a competing firm. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:11 am
Last month the Minnesota Supreme Court accepted review of State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:11 am
After all, then the defendant might be whipsawed by the plaintiff deciding that, gosh, there should be punitive damages once the case has been remanded to state court (something that happened to a client of mine once in the District of Minnesota). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:54 am
The complaint, filed in Minnesota federal district court, alleges that the league has violated federal antitrust laws as well as state contract and tort laws. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Fla., Oct. 29, 1998) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:55 am
” Id.; see also State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
But even if Minnesota courts take the opposite view as a matter of state law, such a view would be preempted by the First Amendment.I hope the state law and First Amendment objections were properly preserved at trial, and that the defendant appeals. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
But even if Minnesota courts take the opposite view as a matter of state law, such a view would be preempted by the First Amendment.I hope the state law and First Amendment objections were properly preserved at trial, and that the defendant appeals. [read post]
