Search for: "State v. Allen" Results 1241 - 1260 of 3,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 2:04 pm
”“The sentencing judge did not err in finding the sentence proportional to the gravity of the offence,” said the three-judge panel in its decision in R v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 11:06 am
I know I do.Justice Rubin starts today's opinion with:"May the second-place bidder on a public works contract state a cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage against the winning bidder if the winner was only able to obtain lowest bidder status by illegally paying its workers less than the prevailing wage? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:32 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Both the Virginia ruling and other similar recent decisions relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Super. 8, No. 3174 EDA 2012 (Jan. 14, 2015 Stabile, Ford Elliott, Bowes, Allen, Wecht, Jenkins, J.) [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
” Grants For late February ALLEN MARK DACUS, ELIZABETH C. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
” Grants For late February ALLEN MARK DACUS, ELIZABETH C. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:12 am by Lisa Whittaker
Allen had lost his dentistry license in Michigan, been convicted of several criminal offenses, and was not supposed to leave the state of Michigan. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by John Jascob
The reversal of the injunction came just two days after the court heard a speedy interlocutory appeal in the case (C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Both §§71 and 73, however, set out post-termination procedures for the purpose of considering applications for reinstatement submitted by an employee terminated pursuant to §§71 and 72, respectively, within one year following the end of their disability.* See, for example, 4 NYCRR 5.9, which provisions apply to employees of the State of New York as the employer in the classified service.The Allen decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Ken Chasse
Allen-Vanguard Corp. 2011 ONSC 7575, [2011] O.J. [read post]