Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 1241 - 1260 of 12,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
Conference of March 21, 2008 __________________ Docket: 07-608 Case name: United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 4:12 am
In re Martha Maria Sanchez Quiroz, Serial No. 90630537 (August 5, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas V. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm by Christopher Simon
In a June 2022 decision the Georgia Court of Appeals, “A22A0361” Bennett v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:16 am by Howard Wasserman
A unanimous Supreme Court in Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by INFORRM
Wilkinson v Downton is a legal curiosity well known to legal students. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
 In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:00 am by Philip Thomas
An A.P. article on Tuesday stated that the 5th Circuit's ruling on the constitutionality of Mississippi's non-economic damages caps will not be made until 2013. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm by David Super
  Nothing in Article V grants Congress that power, and it is difficult to see Congress doing so when roughly forty states would have less influence under such a system than under one-state-one vote. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 12:15 pm
As a result of a groundbreaking settlement approved yesterday by Judge Jeremiah Lynch in our case, Langford v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]