Search for: "State v. Cross"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 14,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:41 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc. cross-appeals the district court’s award of attorney fees and expenses. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
Pack v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:36 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Frye v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Frye v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:09 am
John Echohawk, Jaqueline Pata, and Terry Cross have a scathing op-ed on Politico here. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:48 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Medicare Like Rates)United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm
But above all, it's a chance for three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and the consumer class-action plaintiffs to argue that an adverse inference is warranted (or, as a fallback position, a curative instruction).If not for the Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
Only two things worked out well for Qualcomm on the litigation front this year: the Lasinski cross-examination and the fact that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit allowed Qualcomm's interlocutory appeal of Judge Lucy H. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:16 pm
David Bernhardt (Land into Trust) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlNavajo Nation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:16 pm
David Bernhardt (Land into Trust) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlNavajo Nation v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:02 am
By Eric Goldman In the 1992 case Quill v. [read post]
