Search for: "State v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
The district court in Williams itself acknowledged that the issue required an examination of the particular facts. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Vimeo (the 2013 district court ruling) and Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
This issue came up in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (April 14, 2017) when it affirmed a district court that rejected the filed rate doctrine at summary judgment because there were, for example, genuine issues of material fact in dispute about whether the federal agency—in this case, the Department of Transportation—effectively abdicated its authority to review certain unfiled air fares. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:29 pm
District court: No dice. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
The district court and the Ninth Circuit both refused to enforce the arbitration agreement on the ground that the class arbitration waiver was unconscionable under California’s Discover Bank rule. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
The question is currently before the Supreme Court in Nijhawan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
See Williams, 549 U.S. at 343, 356-57; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
The use of antebellum state court decisions to interpret the Second AmendmentC. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Korn v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
It was wham, bam, thank you Supreme Court of the United States for American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on November 12. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 4:02 am
On June 1, 2021, the matter was assigned to United States District Court Judge Joshua Kindred. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 9:45 pm
The filed rate doctrine itself arose in a 1922 US Supreme Court case called Keogh v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 3:33 pm
The Court had no problem with supplemental jurisdiction of state law claims and accepted minimal but sufficient allegations of intent to return. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The federal case is pending and being held in abeyance until any appeal of either state court decision becomes final.[2] On April 1, 2022, in Crest v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm
Circuit Court, conflicting directly with the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:53 pm
Accordingly, to the extent that it conflicts with this decision, we disapprove of Nord and adopt the opinion of the Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida in State v. [read post]
