Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1241 - 1260 of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
” (citing Galef v Alexander and Edgar v MITE Corp, respectively, p.15) And so, as agreed by the parties, Dutch law would apply to this action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
In 2006, the Delhi High Court in the case of the Scotch Whisky Association v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"After rejecting the State's arguments, Judge Debevoise suggested that the State reconcile the Truth in Music Act with the Lanham Act by interpreting subsection (e) of the former to permit unregistered trademark holders to perform under their group names without any additional requirements. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:45 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey The takeaway from Hahn v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am by Marcel Pemsel
I.e. member states could delay the effectiveness of this provision to the year 2525 if they so desire. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 7:36 pm
It now appears as though the much-anticipated case al-Marri v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
This reasoning walks a fine line without providing any certainty for trade mark holders and future applicants as to where the protection of a word or concept begins and where it ends. [read post]