Search for: "State v. London"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:56 pm
City of New London (2005). [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
”In the London Review of Books, Andrew Bacevich covers The General v. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War by H.W. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Do you think London cabs have such a distinctive character enough to hold a trade mark? [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
FLAG -- meets next week on the evening of 18 March, in the House of Lords, London. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:35 am
Haier I and Sisvel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:08 am
The Court noted that AXA would only have the duty to defend the City if the Statements of Claim in the underlying actions alleged a state of facts that, properly construed, would support an action that could potentially fall within coverage: Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyds of London v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:05 pm
Tenenbaum, one of the hundreds of cases consolidated in Boston under the caption London-Sire v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:45 pm
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:41 pm
The case is Sasol Oil v CSARS. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
