Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 8,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2022, 3:21 pm
From Chief Judge Beryl Howell's decision Jan. 28 in Lee v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 12:09 pm
United States (Bankruptcy Discharge; McGirt v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:55 am
More on Batson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v Bollinger (84 EPD ¶41,415) in which the High Court upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:23 am
Haaland v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:58 pm
Learn more about race and the death penalty: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:06 am
In the case of Orum v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:53 am
Mass. 1975) (3-judge court), and the one decision cited in that case, State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:54 pm
However, in the case of Batson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:30 am
Color-Blindness in University Admissions Will be Difficult to Enforce and Lead to Much More LitigationIn his dissent in Gritter v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:21 am
§ 1973, applies to state felon disenfranchisement laws that result in discrimination on the basis of race; and (2) whether the Massachusetts felon disenfranchisement scheme established in 2000 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as applied to those Massachusetts felons who were incarcerated and yet had the right to vote prior to 2000. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:12 am
As most will recall, in 2005, the Supreme Court in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
Much of Moreno’s piece does not even address the facts, preferring instead to attack civil rights advocates from Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am
Thanks so much to Professor Neil Richards (who generously serves as our First Amendment guest expert) for his thoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
Alabama (1994), which stated that they could not be exercised on race or gender grounds, were incorrectly decided. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:17 pm
State off-topic: not everything on the net is necessarily true, not … (More as I find them, or in the pingbacks.) [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
