Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2020, 4:09 am
And to add to the amusement, Steve Vladeck points out what’s “clear” about these shenanigans. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
But, again, that wasn’t the question — just as it wasn’t the question for the Quirin court, as Steve Vladeck has pointed out (emphasis in original): The question, of course, is what Quirin meant by “offenses committed by enemy belligerents against the law of war. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
Bandemer (Oct. 7) Professor Steve Vladeck, United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm
Research by Steve Vladeck. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Steve Vladeck identifies what he describes as a “subtle but serious flaw” in the decision at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
” Briefly: For this blog, Steve Vladeck covers the federal government’s request in Sessions v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
In the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Steve Vladeck “take a deep dive into two cases at the intersection of federal courts and foreign relations that are being argued during the November sitting: Jam v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the grant in Armstong v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am
As law professor Steve Vladeck explained in November, Michaels later filed a motion seeking to have deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein, rather than Matthew Whitaker, whom the president has named as the acting attorney general, substituted for Sessions, on the ground that the federal law governing vacancies in the executive branch does not trump another law outlining the order of succession for officials in the Department of Justice. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Steve Vladeck writes at Lawfare about an amicus brief filed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in support of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
Even without these misconceptions, however, much of the draft is far from clear, so Jack, Steve Vladeck, and Ryan Goodman wrote up six questions that Congress should ask Administration witnesses in upcoming hearings on the AUMF. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck previews his testimony this morning before the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:53 am
The proper scope of presidential power remains a central focus of law, policy, and politics, of course, as evidenced by the debate Steve Vladeck notes tonight and by Charlie Savage’s NY Times article earlier this week. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Steve Vladeck provided a preview of the upcoming argument in the al-Nashiri case before the D.C. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 11:09 am
Although some commentators have criticized this operation as lacking congressional authority, Steve Vladeck notes that 1868 Hostage Act appears to apply. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
Steve Vladeck analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
” And at Prawfs Blawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the book’s “near-obsession with the topic of state sovereign immunity. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 10:29 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Steve Vladeck followed up on Bobby’s post about the administration’s potential Guantanamo endgame by posing a detainee math problem that may bedevil any such strategy. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:56 am
At least Steve Vladeck at PrawfsBlawg took issue with the substance of Roberts' dissent, while others were blinded by the CJ's writing skills or endorsed the "hunch" theory of policing. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:15 am
On July 20, Steve Vladeck and I published a Lawfare article entitled “DHS Authorizes Domestic Surveillance to Protect Statues and Monuments,” based on a DHS I&A document leaked to me. [read post]
