Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:38 am
However, recent Supreme Court, federal court, and agency decisions have ignored this longstanding analysis and have instead examined these issues through the lens of Taylor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
After holding that “the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by the Taylor Law,” the Appellate Division explained: Contrary to the District's contention, an arbitrator's award in favor of the Association would not violate public policy. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:24 pm
Today's published opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:03 am
Drawing on the analytical methodology laid out in several Supreme Court opinions, including Taylor v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:20 am
See Jewelers Vigilance Comm., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
An arbitrator's award may only be vacated by a court if it violates public policy, is irrational or it exceeds specified limitations on the arbitrator's powerSubway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
The court in Taylor v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
As he said in A v B, “The [public figure] should recognise that because of his public position he must expect and accept that his actions will be more closely scrutinised by the media. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
A party to a stipulation of settlement cannot withdraw from the stipulation on the basis that it had "improvidently"agreed to itState of New York v Public Employment. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:13 am
"A [Taylor Law] contract may … prohibit disciplinary action in the face of pending criminal charges. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:25 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Lavar Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:25 am
In doing so, it quoted a 2006 US Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:25 am
In doing so, it quoted a 2006 US Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
A school board waiver of its right to dismiss a probationary school administrator at any time during the probationary term must be explicitly statedConsedine v Portville Cent. [read post]
