Search for: "US Inventor" Results 1241 - 1260 of 7,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2023, 4:53 pm by thomasgalvani
 It essentially signals that the inventor is pursuing legal protection for their creation. [read post]
10 May 2023, 3:47 pm by Corynne McSherry
   The court goes on: “fair use doesn’t require inventors to follow the least efficient solution or engage in wasted efforts simply to avoid liability. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 5:26 am by assoulineberlowe
  The hope is that in the future, the inventor can show when they first conceived of the invention by using the unopened envelope date stamped by the Postal Service. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 5:26 am by assoulineberlowe
  The hope is that in the future, the inventor can show when they first conceived of the invention by using the unopened envelope date stamped by the Postal Service. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:29 am by Isaac
 As for the US case, there are no related granted patents but there is a published application. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Fact is, successful businesses, useful inventions, and compelling works of art are all, as Thomas Edison — himself more a shrewd businessman than a genius inventor — is reputed to have said, invention is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:37 am by Dennis Crouch
  I am close to 100% sure that the Federal Circuit will affirm that US law requires the patentee to identify a human inventor. = = = In the course of oral arguments, the government made two odd claims, neither of which were fully developed. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:26 am
Can an employer be 'too big to pay' employee-inventor compensation under s40(1) of the Patents Act? [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 10:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Contemplate also -- US 7,899,616 -- assigned to Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
This "defense" to infringement requires a "commercial use", which can be "an internal commercial use or an actual arm's length sale or other arm's length commercial transfer of a useful end result of such commercial use. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
This "defense" to infringement requires a "commercial use", which can be "an internal commercial use or an actual arm's length sale or other arm's length commercial transfer of a useful end result of such commercial use. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
A new provision (35 U.S.C. 123) defines the term “micro entity” as the patent applicant (inventor): Qualifies as a small entity; Has not been named as an inventor on more than 4 previously filed US non-provisional patent applications (not including inventions assigned based upon prior employment); Does not have an income of more than 3x the median US household income ($50k for 2009); and Has not conveyed or contractually promised to convey… [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Chrimar En Banc Brief Eagle Forum Brief (Schlafly) US Inventor Inc Brief (Morinville) USIJ, Center for Individual Freedom, and Conservatives for Property Rights Brief Brief of 14 Local Inventor Associations Brief of 20 Entrepreneurial Inventors The difficulty for the Federal Circuit in this case is the 1922 Supreme Court case of John Simmons Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 1:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The first claim of US 8,647,872, with second named inventor Woo-Suk Hwang, recitesAn embryonic stem cell line derived from a nucleus-transferred oocyte prepared by transferring a nucleus of a human somatic cell into an enucleated human oocyte, which is a cell line deposited under the accession number KCLRF-BP-00092. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 11:02 am
In Part 1 I laid out the three-step invention protection plan I encourage inventors to use to help prevent their invention from being stolen. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by James Yang
Your use of your own trade secret will not bar the second inventor from receiving the patent. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:35 am
That prevented Engelbart from collecting royalties on the mouse when it was in its widest use. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 112, ¶ 1 (2006).3 One purpose of this statutoryprovision is to require an inventor to provide sufficient detail in a patent’s specification to enable a person of ordinaryskill in the art to make and use the invention. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
It will also cause us to address the scope of protections afforded to “inventors” by the right to bring derivation actions encompassed within the first- inventor-to-file provision of the AIA. [...] [read post]