Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 1241 - 1260 of 3,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 10:36 am
In this particular case, Norwegian Cruise Lines attempted to require application of foreign law to the seaman's claims, depriving him of his United States statutory rights under the Jones Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
  The Court also denied cert. in Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:38 am by Keith Lee
United States: The government fared much better than everyone realizes, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 23, 2012, 4:07 PM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/01/reactions-to-jones-v-united-states-the-government-fared-much-better-than-everyone-realizes/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am by Noam Biale
United States that the government had to prove that the defendant knew he was an unlawful possessor of a firearm, an element not proven at Jones’s trial. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ultimately agreed with the district court’s decision to dismiss Plaintiff’s Jones Act negligence and unseaworthiness claims. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Stephen ReillyAndrew JonesData breach class action lawsuits are already well-established in the United States, but are only developing elsewhere. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 The trial court originally certified an “off-the-clock” class, but granted Allstate’s motion for decertification after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]