Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 1241 - 1260 of 10,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2021, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
‘Steep hill to climb’ In a landmark First Amendment case almost 60 years ago, New York Times v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”To complicate matters, however, a federal statute appears to delegate to the Archivist of the United States the power to decide whether an amendment is valid. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:23 am by Christopher Tyner
This post summarizes an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court on June 15, 2020. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm by Paul Horwitz
That book, summarizing a series of other books, discusses the different ways in which religion tends to manifest itself in different regions of the United States, and the different forms of church-state relations and controversies that these regional differences produce. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
By granting review in yet another state sentencing case, California v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 6:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Instead, the former grants jurisdiction to “any appropriate United States district court, without regard to the amount in controversy, or in any other court of competent jurisdic- tion. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:12 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2005, 11:07 am
At issue, then, is the continued vitality of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]